Codes & standards referenced
The design brief
A grade M25 structural mix for moderate exposure, the everyday specification for reinforced concrete in inland conditions. Materials typical of an Indian RMC setup: OPC 53 grade, fly ash from a compliant source, crushed angular coarse aggregate of 20 mm nominal maximum size, Zone II natural sand, no admixture in the first trial.
| Input | Value | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | M25 (fck = 25 N/mm²) | meets IS 456 Table 5 minimum M25 for moderate exposure |
| Cement + SCM | OPC + 25% fly ash | inside the code's illustrative 15–30% fly ash band |
| Max size of aggregate | 20 mm, angular | single size, crushed |
| Fine aggregate | Zone II, sp. gr. 2.65 | coarse aggregate sp. gr. 2.74 |
| Slump | 50 mm | the Table 4 reference slump |
| Exposure | Moderate | IS 456 Table 5 ceiling w/c 0.50, minimum cement 300 kg/m³ |
Specific gravities: cement 3.15, fly ash 2.20. These are lab inputs for this example, not code constants — measure your own for every design.
Step 1 — Target mean strength (Cl 4.2)
You never design to fck. The code asks for the larger of two margins above the grade: the statistical margin fck + 1.65σ, or the tabulated margin fck + X from Table 1. For M25, Table 1 gives X = 5.5 N/mm². With no established site data, σ comes from Table 2: 4.0 N/mm² for M20–M25.
The X margin exists so that a young plant with a borrowed σ still designs above the grade. Both margins matter: at M25 the statistical margin governs; at lower grades with good control the X margin can govern instead.
Step 2 — Water–cement ratio
Select the w/c for 31.6 N/mm² from the code's strength relationship. For this OPC + fly ash combination, 0.45 is the selection. Then check durability: IS 456 Table 5 caps moderate exposure at w/c 0.50, so 0.45 stands. The same table demands a minimum 300 kg/m³ cementitious content and minimum grade M25 for this exposure — both check out on this brief. The design w/c is the lower of the strength requirement and the durability ceiling, never a negotiation between them.
Step 3 — Water content (Table 4)
Table 4 gives 186 kg/m³ for 20 mm angular aggregate at 50 mm slump — our reference condition, so no correction applies. The adjustment rules you will use more often:
±3% water for every ±25 mm departure from the 50 mm reference slump.
Sub-angular aggregate: −10 kg/m³. Rounded gravel: −20 kg/m³.
A superplasticizer reduces water further; this trial keeps it at zero to stay comparable with the base tables.
Water stays 186 kg/m³. At 10 mm MSA the table starts at 208 kg/m³, at 40 mm it drops to 165 kg/m³ — larger aggregate needs less paste water.
Step 4 — Binder and the SCM split
Total cementitious material = 186 / 0.45 = 413 kg/m³. The fly ash share sits at 25%, inside the code's illustrative range of 15–30% for fly ash (GGBS 25–50%, metakaolin 5–15%). A percentage outside the range needs project data to justify it.
| Check | Value | Limit | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| OPC content | 310 kg/m³ | ≤ 450 kg/m³ (IS 456 Cl 8.2.4.2, SCM excluded) | OK |
| Total cementitious | 413 kg/m³ | ≥ 300 kg/m³ (IS 456 Table 5, moderate) | OK |
| Fly ash share | 25% | 15–30% illustrative range | OK |
Split: OPC 310 kg + fly ash 103 kg per m³.
Step 5 — Absolute volumes (Cl 5.6)
Everything in 1 m³ of concrete must sum to 1 m³ of absolute volume. Table 3 allocates 1.0% entrapped air for 20 mm aggregate (1.5% at 10 mm, 0.8% at 40 mm). Convert each component mass to volume by dividing by specific gravity × 1000:
That 0.659 m³ is all the volume left for both aggregates — the next step decides how it splits between them.
Step 6 — Coarse : fine split (Table 5, Annex B, Cl 5.5.2)
Table 5 gives the coarse-aggregate volume fraction of total aggregate at a reference w/c of 0.50. For 20 mm aggregate: Zone I 0.60, Zone II 0.62, Zone III 0.64, Zone IV 0.66. Coarser sand zones carry more coarse aggregate. Then two corrections:
Correct for the actual w/c
The fraction moves linearly by ±0.01 for every ±0.05 the w/c sits away from 0.50. Our w/c of 0.45 is one step below: (0.50 − 0.45) / 0.05 × 0.01 = +0.01. Zone II base 0.62 + 0.01 = 0.63. Lower w/c means richer paste, so the mix carries relatively more coarse aggregate to keep the sand within workable limits.
Correct for pumping (Cl 5.5.2)
Pumped concrete reduces the coarse-aggregate fraction by up to 10%. This design is placed by crane and skip, so no reduction applies here — but the correction is standard for boom-pumped RMC.
With CA fraction 0.63 and aggregate volume 0.659 m³, the masses follow directly (volumes × specific gravity × 1000):
Where two coarse-aggregate sizes are blended, Cl 5.1 allows combining them in suitable proportions; the masses above then split across the blend. The fine aggregate similarly splits across sources if you blend sands of different zones.
The trial batch, per m³
| Material | SSD mass, kg/m³ | Source step |
|---|---|---|
| Water | 186 | Table 4, uncorrected |
| OPC | 310 | 413 × 75% |
| Fly ash | 103 | 413 × 25% |
| Coarse aggregate, 20 mm | 1137 | Table 5 fraction 0.63 of 0.659 m³ |
| Fine aggregate, Zone II | 646 | remainder, fraction 0.37 |
| Entrapped air | 1.0% | Table 3 |
Reference: IS 10262:2019 Cl 4.2, Tables 1–5, Cl 5.2–5.7, Annex B; IS 456:2000 Table 5 and Cl 8.2.4.2.
A design is a hypothesis until it is batched. Trial-batch it, check slump and 7/28-day strengths, and correct moisture on the stockpiles before judging anything: weigh aggregates at their moist stock mass and credit the free water against the batch water, so the w/c you designed is the w/c you batch. Our trial mix batch book automates exactly that, and what the cubes must then prove is the subject of the IS 456 acceptance walkthrough. The vocabulary — characteristic strength, σ, target mean — is defined in Part 6 of our glossary.
Try it live
IS 10262:2019 Mix Design Report
This site's mix design report calculator implements exactly the steps above — Table 1/2 target strength, the Table 4 water with slump and shape corrections, the SCM ranges, the Cl 5.6 volume budget and the Table 5 fraction with Annex B continuous w/c correction and Cl 5.5.2 pumping reduction. Change one input and watch every downstream number move.
Open the calculatorRelated articles
IS 456 Cube Test Acceptance Explained
What the cubes from this mix must prove: group-of-four means, individual limits and σ.
Nominal Mix vs Design Mix
Why 1:2:4 is not a Table 9 proportion, and where each route is permitted.
Mix Design Masterclass — IS 10262:2019
The wider context: materials, admixtures and trial-batch discipline around the tables.
Amit Haridas
Founder & Proprietor, ConcreteInfo. 25+ years of experience in concrete technology, RMC plant operations, construction quality, consulting and technical training across India.