Why this calc exists
Formwork design hinges on the lateral pressure that fresh concrete exerts on the shutters. Two extremes bound the problem: zero pressure (if concrete behaved like a solid) and full hydrostatic head (γ·h, if concrete behaved like water). Reality is between, governed by placement rate, temperature, and chemistry.
ACI 347R-14 Eq 2.2 captures this with an empirical formula that gives p_max = Cw·Cc·[7.2 + 785·R/(T+17.8)] kPa, where R = placement rate (m/h), T = concrete T (°C). The 30 kPa floor and full hydrostatic cap (γ·h) bracket the result. The formwork pressure calculator applies the SI form with the validity bounds.
Code references (with provenance)
- ACI 347R-14 — Guide to Formwork for Concrete (Eq 2.2 SI form). The primary reference.
- CIRIA C544 — Concrete pressure on formwork (UK alternative; gives similar but slightly different values).
- IS 14687:1999 — Falsework and formwork for concrete structures — code of practice (Indian context).
Worked: column, 3 m tall, R = 2 m/h, T = 30 °C
Eq 2.2: p_max = 1.0·1.0·[7.2 + 785·2/(30+17.8)] = 7.2 + 1570/47.8 = 7.2 + 32.8 = 40.0 kPa.
Hydrostatic cap: γ·h = 24 × 3 = 72 kPa.
30 kPa floor: 30 < 40, so the Eq value stands.
Design pressure: 40 kPa (lower of Eq and hydrostatic, since 40 < 72).
Field notes (what trips people up)
- Outside validity bounds, use hydrostatic. ACI 347R's Eq is calibrated for slump ≤ 175 mm, internal vibration, R ≤ 2.1 m/h (columns), height ≤ 4.2 m. SCC mixes with slump 600+ mm behave differently; tall walls (> 4 m) often reach hydrostatic; very high placement rates push toward the hydrostatic cap.
- 30 kPa floor is conservative. For low walls (≤ 1 m), the equation can predict < 30 kPa; the code imposes 30 kPa minimum to account for construction vibration, workers on top, and impact loads.
- CIRIA vs ACI. CIRIA C544 gives slightly higher pressures for SCC and lower for low-heat mixes. ACI is more conservative for normal mixes; CIRIA for SCC. Site practice: pick the more conservative of the two.
- Formwork ties and walers must resist this pressure over the full panel area. Under-design of ties is the #1 formwork failure mode.
Worked example
Site: 4 m lift of shear wall, R = 1.5 m/h, T = 28 °C, OPC no retarder, internal vibration.
Eq: 7.2 + 785·1.5/(28+17.8) = 7.2 + 25.7 = 32.9 kPa.
Hydrostatic: 24 × 4 = 96 kPa.
Design: 32.9 kPa (Eq value), with 30 kPa floor → 32.9.
FAQ
Why does placement rate matter?
Faster placement means more fresh concrete on top of partially-set concrete — the lower layers behave more like liquid. Slow placement lets the bottom set and not contribute to lateral pressure.
What about superplasticizer / SCC?
SCC behaves much closer to liquid; the ACI equation underestimates. For SCC, use CIRIA C544 or a hydrostatic assumption (γ·h).
Why is the formula metric-unfriendly in some sources?
ACI 347R has separate IP and SI versions. The IP version uses p in psf, R in ft/h, T in °F. We use the SI form: p in kPa, R in m/h, T in °C. The constants 7.2 and 785 are the SI conversion.
Related reading & tools
- ../calculators/formwork-pressure.html — Formwork Pressure calculator
- formwork-engineering-is14687.html — Formwork Engineering — IS 14687 (blog)
- formwork-types-and-liners.html — Formwork Types and Liners (blog)